Muskhogean Family

The Seventh Annual Report of the Bureau of Ethnology, 1885-1886, (based upon Muskhogees, Hitchittees, Seminoles), Pritchard, Phys. Hist. Mankind, v. 402, 1847 (includes Muskhogees, Seminoles, Hitchittees)

  • Muskhogies, Berghaus (1845, Physik. Atlas, map 17, 1848) Ibid., 1852.
  • Muscogee, Keane, App. Stanford’s comp. (Cent. And So. Am.), 460, 471, 1678 (includes Muscogees proper, and Seminoles, Chickasaws, Choctaws, Hitchittees, Coosadas or Coosas, Alibamous, Apalaches).
  • Maskoki, Gatschet, Creek Mig. Legend, I, 50, 1884 (general account of family; four branches, Maskoki, Apalachian, Alibama, Chalita). Berghaus, Physik. Atlas, map 72, 1887.
  • Choctaw Muskhogee, Gallatin in Trans. and Coll. Am. Antiq. Soc., II, 119, 1836.
  • Chocta-Muskhog, Gallatin in Trans. Ant. Eth. Soc., II, pt. 1, xcix, 77, 1848. Gallatin in Schoolcraft, Ind, Tribes, in, 401, 1853.
  • Chata-Muskoki, Hale in Am. Antiq., 108, April, 1883 (considered with reference to migration).
  • Chahtas, Gallatin in Trans. and Coll. Am, Antiq. Soc., II, 100, 306, 1836 (or Choctaws).
  • Chahtahs, Pritchard, Phys. Hist. Mankind, v. 403, 1847 (or Choktahs or Flatheads).
  • Tschahtas, Berghans (1845), Physik. Atlas, map 17, 1848. Ibid., 1852.
  • Choctah, Latham, Nat. Hist, Man, 337, 1850 (includes Choctahs, Muscogulges” Muskohges). Latham in Trans. Phil. Soc, Lond,, 103,, 1856, Latham, Opuscula, 366, 1860.
  • Mobilian, Bancroft, Hist. U. S., 249, 1840.
  • Flat-heads, Prichard, Phys. Hist, Mankind, v. 403, 1847 (Chahtahs or Choktahs).
  • Coshattas, Latham, Nat. Hist. Man, 349, 1850 (net classified).
  • Humus, Latham, Nat. Hist. Man, 341, 1850 (east of Mississippi above Now Orleans).

Derivation, From the mute of the principal tribe of the Creek confederacy.

In the Muskhogee family Gallatin includes the Muskhogees proper, who lived on, the Coosa or Tallapoosa Rivers; the Hitchittees, living on the Chattahoochee and Flint Rivers; and the Seminoles of the peninsula of Florida. It was his opinion, formed by a, comparison of vocabularies, that the Choctaws and Chickasaws should also be classed under this family. In fact, he called the family Choctaw Mukhogee. In deference, however, to established usage, the two tribes were kept separate in his table and upon the colored map. In 1818 he appears to be fully convinced of the soundness or the view doubtfully expressed in 1836, and calls the family the Chocta-Muskhog.

Geographic Distribution

The area occupied by this family was very extensive. It may be described in a general way as extending from the Savannah River and the Atlantic west to the Mississippi, and from the Gulf of Mexico north to the Tennessee River. All of this territory was held by Muskhogean tribes, except the small areas occupied by thy Yuchi, Na’htchi, and some small settlements of Shawni.

Upon the northeast, Muskhogean limits are indeterminate. The Creeks claimed only to the Savannah River; but upon its lower course the Yamasi are believed to have extended east of that river in the sixteenth to the eighteenth century. The-territorial line between. The Muskhogean family and the Catawba tribe in South Carolina can only be conjectured.

It seems probable that the whole peninsula of Florida was at one time held by the tribes of Timuquanan connection; but from 1702 to 1708, when the Apalachi were driven out, the tribes of northern Florida also were forced away by the English. After that time the Seminoles and the Yamasi were the only Indians that held possession of the Floridian peninsula.

Principal Tribes

Alibamu, Apalachi, Chicasa (Chickasaw), Choctaw, Creek or Maskoki proper, Koasati, Seminole, Yamacraw, Yamasi.


There is an Alibamu town on Deep creek, Indian Territory, an affluent of the Canadian, Indian Territory. Most of- the inhabitants are of this tribe. There are Alibamu about 20 miles south of Alexandria, Louisiana, and over 100 in Polk County, Texas.

So far as known only 3 women of the Apalachi survived in 1886, and they lived at the Alibamu town above referred to. There are 4 families of Koasati, about 25 individuals, near the town of Shepherd, San Jacinto County, Texas. Of the Yamasi none are known to survive.


Indian Territory,

Department of the Interior. Report on Indians Taxed and Indians not Taxed in the United States, Except Alaska at the Eleventh Census: 1890. Washington DC: Government Printing Office. 1894.

Search Military Records - Fold3

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Pin It on Pinterest

Scroll to Top