St. Paul Minnesota Directories 1856-1922 and 1981

This collection comprises a total of 64 directories which cover the years of 1856-1922 (incomplete) and 1981. They were placed online by the St. Paul Public Library and are completely free for viewing and printing. You will need a clipping tool in order to save images of these pages.

From 1856-1925, directories generally included:

  • City and County officials.
  • Schools, churches, hotels, fraternal organizations and societies.
  • Advertisements, including an index to advertisers.
  • An alphabetical list of residents and businesses with street name (no house numbers), and occupation of residents or type of business.

St. Paul Minnesota Directories 1856-1922

1929 – a dotted circle symbol was introduced to indicate homeowner. Wives’ names were added after the husband’s name. The street index was printed on pink paper. A separate index to South St. Paul streets (also pink) was added, although South St. Paul residents were included in the white pages of the St. Paul general listings

1933 – all adults in the household were listed.

1940 – a bell symbol was added to indicate a telephone, although no phone number was given.

1948 – the South St. Paul Street Directory was dropped.

1950 – alphabetical listings included suburbanites who worked in St. Paul.

1956 – the first South Suburban and North Suburban directories were published.

1961 – telephone numbers were added to the street index.

1964 – a separate telephone number section was added.


Collection:

4 thoughts on “St. Paul Minnesota Directories 1856-1922 and 1981”

  1. You have a bad link in your list of St. Paul, Minnesota Directories 1856-1922
    The link for: “St.Paul Minnesota City Directory v. 1891” actually takes you to the Directory for 1890.

    In the first half of the web address there is a string that reads: ……%2F00000030&init_width……
    It should be “31” not “30” – as in …..%2F00000031&init_width……
    (I noticed that 1890 was also “30” and 1892 was “32” – so it wasn’t hard to figure it out that 1891 should be “31”)

    Reply

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Discover more from Access Genealogy

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading