Clarke County MS

North America Indian Names of Places in Mississippi, Alabama, Georgia, Florida, and Louisiana

The post examines the significance and origins of North American Indian place names in Mississippi, Alabama, Georgia, Florida, and Louisiana, particularly those derived from the Choctaw and Chickasaw languages. It highlights how these names reflect the rich cultural and linguistic heritage of the Native American tribes, while noting that many translations have become corrupted over time. The text provides numerous examples of place names alongside their original meanings, illustrating the deep historical connections embedded in the geography of the region.

Slave Narrative of Allen V. Manning

Allen V. Manning, born into slavery in 1850 in Mississippi, reflects on his early life under a Baptist preacher. He recounts the harsh realities of slavery, emphasizing that both slaves and masters were products of their upbringing. Manning describes the family dynamics on the plantation, his master’s reluctance to fight in the Civil War, and his eventual migration to Louisiana and Texas after the war. Despite the challenges faced by freed people, he holds a pragmatic view on racial dynamics, attributing behavior to what people have been taught.

Biography of David G. Parker, D. D. S.

David G. Parker, D.D.S., born in Alabama in 1850, is a distinguished dentist in Riverside, California. His parents were of diverse origins, with roots in Massachusetts and Germany. After moving to Mississippi, Parker pursued education and telegraphy before turning to dentistry. He graduated from Indiana Dental College in 1882 and initially practiced in Louisiana. Seeking better health, he relocated to Riverside in 1888, where he quickly established a reputable practice. Married to Lulu D. Blackshear, the couple has three children and is building a home in Riverside.

Margaret Ferrill Census Card

The application for enrollment of Margaret Ferrill and her sons, Washington, Lemuel, and Charley, was refused by the Dawes Commission. The family, linked to Mississippi Choctaw Indians, was subject to a decision rendered on April 15, 1902, after a hearing in Meridian, Mississippi, on April 12. Despite approval from the Secretary of the Interior on June 5, 1902, their case was ultimately rejected due to the preceding decision in Julia Thompson’s case. Notifications regarding this outcome were sent on April 23, 1902.

Candis Allen Dawes Commission Decision

On April 15, 1902, the Commission to the Five Civilized Tribes ruled on applications for identification as Mississippi Choctaws, including those of Candis Allen and others. The Commission found the evidence insufficient to support their claims to rights in the Choctaw lands, leading to a refusal of their applications. This decision was subsequently affirmed by the Secretary of the Interior on June 5, 1902. Following these proceedings, the record was forwarded for further review.

Candis Allen Census Card

The application for Candis Allen and her family, residing in Hale, Mississippi, was rejected under the Dawes Act due to their non-citizen status. Allen, aged 48, and her children, ranging from ages 5 to 20, all held varying degrees of Choctaw blood but were ultimately denied citizenship. The decision, issued on April 15, 1902, was linked to a wider case involving Julia Thompson and noted in official communications with the Department of the Interior throughout 1902.

Tobias Brock Dawes Census Card

The application for Tobias Brock, a 68-year-old Mississippi Choctaw Indian with ¼ blood quantum, was refused based on prior decisions regarding the case of Julia Thompson and others. Filed in Meridian, Mississippi, on April 12, 1901, the application was thoroughly processed, with notices of decision mailed to relevant parties by April 23, 1902. Despite the approval from the Secretary of the Interior on June 5, 1902, the claim ultimately fell under rejection, as indicated in the departmental communications.

Julia Thompson Dawes Census Card

Julia Thompson, a 74-year-old Mississippi Choctaw Indian, had her application for tribal recognition rejected. Her family background was noted, indicating ¼ blood quantum through her deceased parents, Willoughby Trotter and Ann Trotter. The decision, rendered on April 15, 1902, followed extensive reviews and testimonies taken in Meridian, Mississippi, in April 1901. The rejection was communicated to various legal representatives and forwarded to the Secretary of the Interior shortly after the decision announcement.

Willoughby Thompson Dawes Census Card

The application of Willoughby Thompson, a 37-year-old male Mississippi Choctaw Indian with ⅛ blood quantum, was submitted but ultimately rejected. His case was linked to other applications under M.C.R. 1862. Despite testimony taken on April 12, 1901, and the case being reviewed by the Secretary of the Interior, the decision rendered on April 15, 1902, confirmed the rejection. Notices were subsequently forwarded to relevant attorneys and departments between June 5 and April 23, 1902, detailing the departmental actions taken.

Indiana Coleman Dawes Packet

On April 15, 1902, the Commission to the Five Civilized Tribes ruled against identifying Indiana Coleman and others as Mississippi Choctaws entitled to land rights. The decision was based on insufficient evidence regarding their claims under the treaty from 1830. Subsequently, on June 5, 1902, the Secretary of the Interior upheld this ruling. Correspondence from Iams Bixby confirmed these decisions, which denied recognition of their identities as Choctaw Indians for the purpose of claiming rights to the Choctaw lands.

Allen Banistor Dawes Decision

On April 15, 1902, the Commission to the Five Civilized Tribes ruled against the identification of several applicants, including Banistor Allen, as Mississippi Choctaws entitled to land rights. The evidence presented was deemed insufficient. This decision was subsequently affirmed by the Secretary of the Interior on June 5, 1902, confirming the refusal of the applications. The case underscores the rigorous scrutiny faced by those claiming Native identity and rights in relation to the Choctaw Nation’s lands.

Allen Bannister Dawes Census Card

The Dawes Census Card for Allen Bannister details his family members, their ages, and blood lineage, indicating he is a 31-year-old male with a ¼ Choctaw blood quantum. His wife, Candis Allen, and their children, including Alex, Fannie, Charley, and Luther, each hold varying degrees of Choctaw ancestry, marked as ⅛. Despite the family’s application, it was ultimately rejected, with the decision rendered on April 15, 1902, following the precedent set in the case of Julia Thompson and others.

Julia Turner Dawes Census Card

The application for enrollment of Julia Turner, a 39-year-old Mississippi Choctaw Indian with ¼ blood quantum, was rejected. The decision was based on the evidence reviewed during testimonies taken in Meridian, Mississippi, on April 12, 1901. The Secretary of the Interior approved the action on June 5, 1902, with notices regarding the denial forwarded to both the attorneys for the Choctaw and Chickasaw Nations and the applicant’s attorney on June 17, 1902. This decision was linked to case M.C.R. 1862, rendered on April 15, 1902.

Emma Hayes, Dawes Census Card

The application for enrollment of Emma Hayes and her children, residing in DeSoto, Mississippi, was submitted to the Dawes Commission but ultimately refused. Emma, along with her five children, was identified as having Choctaw lineage, yet their claims were rejected based on earlier decisions. Despite the application receiving approval from the Secretary of the Interior in 1902, it did not change the final outcome. The denial was part of a broader case, impacting several applicants.

Indiana Coleman, Dawes Census Card

Indiana Coleman, a 25-year-old female with ¼ Choctaw blood, submitted her Dawes Census Card application, claiming membership in the Mississippi Choctaw Indians. Her application was ultimately rejected, with the decision rendered on April 15, 1902, in conjunction with a similar case involving Julia Thompson. Notifications of this decision were sent to both the applicant and the attorneys for the Choctaw and Chickasaw Nations in April 1902, with final approval documented by the Secretary of the Interior on June 5, 1902.